Subaru XV
Subaru XV, 2.0i, LHD
86% 90%
64% 86%
ADULT OCCUPANT Total 31 pts | 86%
FRONTAL IMPACT 13 pts FRONTAL IMPACT
Driver Passenger
HEAD
Driver airbag contact stable
Passenger airbag contact stable
CHEST
Passenger compartment stable
Windscreen Pillar rearward 3mm
Steering wheel rearward none
Steering wheel upward none
Chest contact with steering
wheel
UPPER LEGS, KNEES AND PELVIS
Stiff structures in dashboard Steering column and adjuster, facia
Concentrated loads on knees Steering column and adjuster, facia
LOWER LEGS AND FEET
Footwell Collapse rupture
Rearward pedal movement accelerator - 73mm
Upward pedal movement none
SIDE IMPACT
Head protection airbag Yes
Chest protection airbag Yes
WHIPLASH
Seat description Standard cloth, 6 way manual
Head restraint type Passive
Geometric assessment 1 pts
TESTS
- High severity 2,4 pts
- Medium severity 2,6 pts
- Low severity 2,5 pts
none
SIDE IMPACT CAR 8 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE 6,4 pts
Car Pole
REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH)
3,4 pts
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
CHILD OCCUPANT Total 44 pts | 90%
18 MONTH OLD CHILD
Restraint
Group
Facing
Installation
Fair G 0/1 Isofix
0 / 1
rearward
ISOFIX anchorages and support
frame
PERFORMANCE
INSTRUCTIONS
INSTALLATION
FRONTAL IMPACT
Head forward movement protected
Head acceleration good
Chest load good
12 pts
4 pts
2 pts
SIDE IMPACT
Head containment protected
Head acceleration good
3 YEAR OLD CHILD
Restraint
Group
Facing
Installation
Römer Duo plus Isofix
1
forward
ISOFIX anchorages and top tether
PERFORMANCE
INSTRUCTIONS
INSTALLATION
11,2 pts
4 pts
2 pts
FRONTAL IMPACT
Head forward movement protected
Head acceleration good
Chest load fair
SIDE IMPACT
Head containment protected
Head acceleration good
VEHICLE BASED
ASSESSMENT
9 pts Airbag warning Label
Text and pictgram label on passenger
sun visor
PEDESTRIAN Total 23 pts | 64% SAFETY ASSIST Total 6 pts | 86%
GOOD
MARGINAL
POOR
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0 pts
Not assessed
3 pts
HEAD 16,9 pts
PELVIS 0 pts
LEG 6 pts
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL
(ESC)
- VDC
Yaw rate ratio (1.00s) 13,80 %
Yaw rate ratio (1.75s) 2,00 %
Lateral displacement (1.07s) 2,95 m
SEATBELT REMINDER
- driver Pass
- passenger Pass
- rear Pass
3 pts
The rating of the Subaru XV has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the performance of the XV against Euro NCAP's latest requirements. Adult occupant In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable. However, there was rupture of several spot-welds in the driver's footwell and the car was penalised. Subaru have informed Euro NCAP that they have made improvements to the welding in this area. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to pose a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the XV scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak chest protection. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.
Get the file: Download here | Type PDF
The rating of the Subaru XV has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the performance of the XV against Euro NCAP's latest requirements. Adult occupant In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable. However, there was rupture of several spot-welds in the driver's footwell and the car was penalised. Subaru have informed Euro NCAP that they have made improvements to the welding in this area. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to pose a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the XV scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak chest protection. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.
Get the file: Download here | Type PDF